<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Linear on Daffa Abhipraya</title><link>https://blog.abhipraya.dev/tags/linear/</link><description>Recent content in Linear on Daffa Abhipraya</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>© Daffa Abhipraya</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.abhipraya.dev/tags/linear/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>PPL: AI-Assisted Sprint Planning [Sprint 2, Week 1]</title><link>https://blog.abhipraya.dev/ppl/part-b/s2w1-ai-literacy/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate><guid>https://blog.abhipraya.dev/ppl/part-b/s2w1-ai-literacy/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="what-i-worked-on">
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#what-i-worked-on" data-anchor="what-i-worked-on" aria-hidden="true">#&lt;/a>
 What I Worked On
&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>This week I used Claude Code (Anthropic&amp;rsquo;s CLI agent) as my primary development partner for Sprint 2 planning, feature brainstorming, code implementation, and CI debugging. The session produced 20 PBIs, 64 subtasks, 3 service file changes, and a merged MR, all in one sitting.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="ai-for-sprint-planning">
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#ai-for-sprint-planning" data-anchor="ai-for-sprint-planning" aria-hidden="true">#&lt;/a>
 AI for Sprint Planning
&lt;/h2>
&lt;h3 id="feature-gap-analysis">
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#feature-gap-analysis" data-anchor="feature-gap-analysis" aria-hidden="true">#&lt;/a>
 Feature Gap Analysis
&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>I asked Claude to explore the entire codebase (frontend + backend + infra) and catalog what&amp;rsquo;s implemented vs missing. It launched parallel exploration agents that traced through routes, services, workers, and the database schema, producing a comprehensive feature inventory.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>PPL: Sprint Planning at Scale [Sprint 2, Week 1]</title><link>https://blog.abhipraya.dev/ppl/part-b/s2w1-discipline/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate><guid>https://blog.abhipraya.dev/ppl/part-b/s2w1-discipline/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="what-i-worked-on">
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#what-i-worked-on" data-anchor="what-i-worked-on" aria-hidden="true">#&lt;/a>
 What I Worked On
&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>As Team Lead, this week&amp;rsquo;s primary work was Sprint 2 planning. I conducted a full feature gap analysis of the app, brainstormed new features with stakeholder input, created detailed tickets in Linear, set up cross-PBI dependency chains, and rebalanced the sprint when it became overloaded.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The result: &lt;strong>20 new PBIs with 64 subtasks&lt;/strong>, all with acceptance criteria, technical notes, and proper sprint/cycle assignments.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>PPL: Ticket Quality as Code Review [Sprint 2, Week 1]</title><link>https://blog.abhipraya.dev/ppl/part-b/s2w1-code-review/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate><guid>https://blog.abhipraya.dev/ppl/part-b/s2w1-code-review/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="what-i-worked-on">
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#what-i-worked-on" data-anchor="what-i-worked-on" aria-hidden="true">#&lt;/a>
 What I Worked On
&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>This week&amp;rsquo;s review work had two dimensions: reviewing the &lt;strong>ticket board&lt;/strong> for sync issues (a form of &amp;ldquo;code review&amp;rdquo; for project management), and letting &lt;strong>SonarQube quality gates&lt;/strong> act as automated code review for the monitoring MR.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="ticket-board-audit">
 &lt;a class="anchor" href="#ticket-board-audit" data-anchor="ticket-board-audit" aria-hidden="true">#&lt;/a>
 Ticket Board Audit
&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>After creating 64 new tickets, I audited all 150+ active tickets (Backlog, Todo, In Progress, In Review) for contradictions and stale data. This is essentially code review applied to project planning.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>